Earnings

Comparing Top Moving Stocks Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) (LAMR), Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK)

The shares of Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) have decreased by more than -0.15% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -7.88% or -$6.34 and now trades at $74.13. The shares of Mohawk Industries, Inc. (NYSE:MHK), has slumped by -53.89% year to date as of 11/08/2018. The shares currently trade at $127.23 and have been able to report a change of -3.40% over the past one week.

The stock of Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) and Mohawk Industries, Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Thursday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 3.00% versus 2.68%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that LAMR will grow it’s earning at a 3.00% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to MHK which will have a positive growth at a 2.68% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of LAMR implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. LAMR has an EBITDA margin of 42%, this implies that the underlying business of LAMR is more profitable. The ROI of LAMR is 12.10% while that of MHK is 10.80%. These figures suggest that LAMR ventures generate a higher ROI than that of MHK.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, LAMR’s free cash flow per share is a positive 3.66, while that of MHK is positive 1.34.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for LAMR is 1.50 and that of MHK is 1.70. This implies that it is easier for LAMR to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than MHK. The debt ratio of LAMR is 2.39 compared to 0.41 for MHK. LAMR can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than MHK.

Valuation

LAMR currently trades at a forward P/E of 21.61, a P/B of 6.80, and a P/S of 4.61 while MHK trades at a forward P/E of 10.54, a P/B of 1.29, and a P/S of 0.96. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, MHK is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of LAMR is currently at a -4.22% to its one-year price target of 77.40. Looking at its rival pricing, MHK is at a -13.41% relative to its price target of 146.94.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), LAMR is given a 3.00 while 2.60 placed for MHK. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for LAMR stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for LAMR is 12.09 while that of MHK is just 1.79. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for MHK stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Lamar Advertising Company (REIT) defeats that of Mohawk Industries, Inc. when the two are compared, with LAMR taking 5 out of the total factors that were been considered. LAMR happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, LAMR is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for LAMR is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Taking Tally Of Nielsen Holdings plc (NLSN), Dana ... The shares of Nielsen Holdings plc have decreased by more than -25.93% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.33% or -$0.09 and now trad...
Uncovering the next great stocks: Sangamo Therapeu... The shares of Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc. have decreased by more than -12.80% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 3.32% or $0.46 and now tr...
Financially Devastating or Fantastic? – Altr... The shares of Altria Group, Inc. have decreased by more than -14.90% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -1.09% or -$0.67 and now trades...
Financially Devastating or Fantastic? – Inte... The shares of Intel Corporation have increased by more than 2.36% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -1.50% or -$0.72 and now trades at...
OPKO Health, Inc. (OPK) is better stock pick than ... The shares of OPKO Health, Inc. have decreased by more than -31.02% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.88% or -$0.03 and now trades ...