Earnings

Set Sail With Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN), Pan American Silver Corp. (PAAS)

The shares of Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. have decreased by more than -28.34% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -1.55% or -$0.26 and now trades at $16.49. The shares of Pan American Silver Corp. (NASDAQ:PAAS), has slumped by -0.45% year to date as of 10/11/2018. The shares currently trade at $15.49 and have been able to report a change of 6.17% over the past one week.

The stock of Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. and Pan American Silver Corp. were two of the most active stocks on Thursday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 22.60% versus 9.57%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that PTEN will grow it’s earning at a 22.60% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to PAAS which will have a positive growth at a 9.57% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of PTEN implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. The ROI of PTEN is -3.70% while that of PAAS is 8.50%. These figures suggest that PAAS ventures generate a higher ROI than that of PTEN.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, PTEN’s free cash flow per share is a negative -2.24.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for PTEN is 1.70 and that of PAAS is 4.10. This implies that it is easier for PTEN to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than PAAS. The debt ratio of PTEN is 0.29 compared to 0.01 for PAAS. PTEN can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than PAAS.

Valuation

PTEN currently trades at a P/B of 0.94, and a P/S of 1.15 while PAAS trades at a forward P/E of 23.58, a P/B of 1.49, and a P/S of 2.83. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, PTEN is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of PTEN is currently at a -25.65% to its one-year price target of 22.18. Looking at its rival pricing, PAAS is at a -20.24% relative to its price target of 19.42.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), PTEN is given a 1.90 while 2.30 placed for PAAS. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for PAAS stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for PTEN is 3.40 while that of PAAS is just 2.38. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for PAAS stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. defeats that of Pan American Silver Corp. when the two are compared, with PTEN taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. PTEN happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, PTEN is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for PTEN is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Comparing Top Moving Stocks Medtronic plc (MDT), T... The shares of Medtronic plc have increased by more than 18.19% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.12% or -$0.11 and now trades at $9...
Which of 2 stocks would appeal to long-term invest... The shares of Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. have decreased by more than -100.00% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -19.87% or -$0...
Financially Devastating or Fantastic? – Heli... The shares of Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. have increased by more than 23.34% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.42% or $0.22 and...
Set Sail With ConocoPhillips (COP), Sabre Corporat... The shares of ConocoPhillips have increased by more than 33.98% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.07% or $1.49 and now trades at $73.5...
Are These Stocks A Sure Bet? – United Microe... The shares of United Microelectronics Corporation have decreased by more than -12.13% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -2.78% or -$0....