Earnings

A Comparison of Top Movers: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (GT), PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS)

The shares of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company have decreased by more than -36.55% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -1.44% or -$0.3 and now trades at $20.50. The shares of PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (NYSE:PAGS), has slumped by -9.38% year to date as of 10/11/2018. The shares currently trade at $26.46 and have been able to report a change of -4.65% over the past one week.

The stock of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and PagSeguro Digital Ltd. were two of the most active stocks on Thursday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 6.49% versus 15.30%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that GT will grow it’s earning at a 6.49% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to PAGS which will have a positive growth at a 15.30% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of PAGS implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. GT has an EBITDA margin of 11.87%, this implies that the underlying business of GT is more profitable. The ROI of GT is 9.30% while that of PAGS is 68.70%. These figures suggest that PAGS ventures generate a higher ROI than that of GT.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, GT’s free cash flow per share is a positive 0.49, while that of PAGS is negative -0.01.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for GT is 1.40 and that of PAGS is 2.70. This implies that it is easier for GT to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than PAGS. The debt ratio of GT is 1.37 compared to 0.00 for PAGS. GT can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than PAGS.

Valuation

GT currently trades at a forward P/E of 5.84, a P/B of 1.06, and a P/S of 0.33 while PAGS trades at a forward P/E of 21.48, a P/B of 5.28, and a P/S of 10.00. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, GT is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of GT is currently at a -23.59% to its one-year price target of 26.83. Looking at its rival pricing, PAGS is at a -20.35% relative to its price target of 33.22.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), GT is given a 2.20 while 2.60 placed for PAGS. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for PAGS stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for GT is 4.70 while that of PAGS is just 4.44. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for PAGS stock.

Conclusion

The stock of PagSeguro Digital Ltd. defeats that of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company when the two are compared, with PAGS taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. PAGS happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, PAGS is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for PAGS is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Which is more compelling pick right now? – B... The shares of Brunswick Corporation have increased by more than 14.38% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.30% or $0.19 and now trades a...
Taking Tally Of Nielsen Holdings plc (NLSN), Deere... The shares of Nielsen Holdings plc have decreased by more than -16.04% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.65% or -$0.2 and now trade...
A Comparison of Top Movers: Novavax, Inc. (NVAX), ... The shares of Novavax, Inc. have increased by more than 2.42% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -6.62% or -$0.09 and now trades at $1....
Choosing Between Hot Stocks: Huntsman Corporation ... The shares of Huntsman Corporation have decreased by more than -12.38% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.88% or -$0.26 and now trad...
A Comparison of Top Movers: Abbott Laboratories (A... The shares of Abbott Laboratories have increased by more than 17.43% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.16% or -$0.11 and now trades...