Earnings

Taking Tally Of Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation (COG), Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC)

The shares of Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation have decreased by more than -19.93% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.88% or $0.64 and now trades at $22.90. The shares of Manulife Financial Corporation (NYSE:MFC), has slumped by -10.88% year to date as of 09/20/2018. The shares currently trade at $18.59 and have been able to report a change of 5.81% over the past one week.

The stock of Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation and Manulife Financial Corporation were two of the most active stocks on Thursday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 48.93% versus 8.82%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that COG will grow it’s earning at a 48.93% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to MFC which will have a positive growth at a 8.82% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of COG implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. COG has an EBITDA margin of 18.82%, this implies that the underlying business of COG is more profitable. The ROI of COG is -1.60% while that of MFC is 7.60%. These figures suggest that MFC ventures generate a higher ROI than that of COG.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, COG’s free cash flow per share is a positive 0.75, while that of MFC is positive 9.92.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of COG is 0.71 compared to 0.33 for MFC. COG can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than MFC.

Valuation

COG currently trades at a forward P/E of 13.90, a P/B of 4.79, and a P/S of 5.94 while MFC trades at a forward P/E of 6.50, a P/B of 1.18, and a P/S of 0.95. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, MFC is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of COG is currently at a -17.51% to its one-year price target of 27.76. Looking at its rival pricing, MFC is at a -21.26% relative to its price target of 23.61.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), COG is given a 2.40 while 1.50 placed for MFC. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for COG stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for COG is 5.40 while that of MFC is just 2.92. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for MFC stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation defeats that of Manulife Financial Corporation when the two are compared, with COG taking 4 out of the total factors that were been considered. COG happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, COG is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for COG is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Financial Metrics You Should Care About: Verizon C... The shares of Verizon Communications Inc. have increased by more than 3.85% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.46% or $0.25 and now tra...
Which of these 2 stocks can turn out to be absolut... The shares of Senseonics Holdings, Inc. have increased by more than 30.83% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 1.16% or $0.04 and now trad...
A Comparison of Top Movers: Ventas, Inc. (VTR), Fi... The shares of Ventas, Inc. have decreased by more than -2.12% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.21% or $1.27 and now trades at $58.74....
Which is more compelling pick right now? – G... The shares of Gilead Sciences, Inc. have increased by more than 4.68% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.83% or -$0.63 and now trade...
A Comparison of Top Movers: United Bankshares, Inc... The shares of United Bankshares, Inc. have increased by more than 6.33% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -1.47% or -$0.55 and now tra...