Earnings

Comparing Valuation And Performance: Regions Financial Corporation (RF), CA, Inc. (CA)

The shares of Regions Financial Corporation have increased by more than 12.79% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 1.72% or $0.33 and now trades at $19.49. The shares of CA, Inc. (NASDAQ:CA), has jumped by 32.27% year to date as of 09/20/2018. The shares currently trade at $44.02 and have been able to report a change of 0.16% over the past one week.

The stock of Regions Financial Corporation and CA, Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Thursday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 9.00% versus 5.52%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that RF will grow it’s earning at a 9.00% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to CA which will have a positive growth at a 5.52% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of RF implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. RF has an EBITDA margin of 53.15%, this implies that the underlying business of RF is more profitable. The ROI of RF is 14.60% while that of CA is 10.00%. These figures suggest that RF ventures generate a higher ROI than that of CA.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, RF’s free cash flow per share is a positive 0, while that of CA is positive 3.36.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of RF is 0.32 compared to 0.35 for CA. CA can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than RF.

Valuation

RF currently trades at a forward P/E of 12.34, a P/B of 1.46, and a P/S of 5.25 while CA trades at a forward P/E of 15.33, a P/B of 2.31, and a P/S of 4.43. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, RF is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of RF is currently at a -4.55% to its one-year price target of 20.42. Looking at its rival pricing, CA is at a 3.55% relative to its price target of 42.51.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), RF is given a 2.60 while 3.00 placed for CA. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for CA stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for RF is 4.24 while that of CA is just 3.98. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for CA stock.

Conclusion

The stock of CA, Inc. defeats that of Regions Financial Corporation when the two are compared, with CA taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. CA happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, CA is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for CA is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Comparing Valuation And Performance: DryShips Inc.... The shares of DryShips Inc. have increased by more than 69.12% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -2.29% or -$0.14 and now trades at $5...
Which of 2 stocks would appeal to long-term invest... The shares of Flex Ltd. have decreased by more than -34.46% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.17% or -$0.02 and now trades at $11.7...
Which of 2 stocks would appeal to long-term invest... The shares of Nabors Industries Ltd. have decreased by more than -10.83% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 1.67% or $0.1 and now trades ...
Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL) is better stock pick tha... The shares of AbbVie Inc. have decreased by more than -1.28% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 1.86% or $1.74 and now trades at $95.47. ...
Which is more compelling pick right now? – B... The shares of Brunswick Corporation have increased by more than 14.38% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.30% or $0.19 and now trades a...