The shares of Lowe’s Companies, Inc. have increased by more than 7.53% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 1.08% or $1.07 and now trades at $99.94. The shares of Nomad Foods Limited (NYSE:NOMD), has jumped by 17.33% year to date as of 08/09/2018. The shares currently trade at $19.84 and have been able to report a change of 3.77% over the past one week.
The stock of Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Nomad Foods Limited were two of the most active stocks on Thursday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.Next 5Y EPS Growth: 16.00% versus 14.29%
When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that LOW will grow it’s earning at a 16.00% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to NOMD which will have a positive growth at a 14.29% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of LOW implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.Profitability and Returns
Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. LOW has an EBITDA margin of 10.7%, this implies that the underlying business of LOW is more profitable. The ROI of LOW is 17.90% while that of NOMD is 6.50%. These figures suggest that LOW ventures generate a higher ROI than that of NOMD.Cash Flow
The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, LOW’s free cash flow per share is a positive 4.13, while that of NOMD is positive 3.93.Liquidity and Financial Risk
The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for LOW is 1.00 and that of NOMD is 1.30. This implies that it is easier for LOW to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than NOMD. The debt ratio of LOW is 2.76 compared to 0.77 for NOMD. LOW can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than NOMD.Valuation
LOW currently trades at a forward P/E of 16.34, a P/B of 14.36, and a P/S of 1.18 while NOMD trades at a forward P/E of 13.33, a P/B of 1.57, and a P/S of 1.49. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, LOW is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.Analyst Price Targets and Opinions
The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of LOW is currently at a -7.98% to its one-year price target of 108.61. Looking at its rival pricing, NOMD is at a 3.44% relative to its price target of 19.18.
When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), LOW is given a 1.90 while 1.90 placed for NOMD. This means that analysts are equally bullish on their outlook for the two stocks stocks.Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment
Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for LOW is 1.85 while that of NOMD is just 0.23. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for NOMD stock.
The stock of Nomad Foods Limited defeats that of Lowe’s Companies, Inc. when the two are compared, with NOMD taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. NOMD happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, NOMD is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for NOMD is better on when it is viewed on short interest.