Earnings

Financial Metrics You Should Care About: PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP), Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (AMBC)

The shares of PepsiCo, Inc. have decreased by more than -5.19% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.19% or $0.21 and now trades at $113.70. The shares of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMBC), has jumped by 37.11% year to date as of 08/09/2018. The shares currently trade at $21.91 and have been able to report a change of 5.85% over the past one week.

The stock of PepsiCo, Inc. and Ambac Financial Group, Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Thursday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 7.54% versus 11.00%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that PEP will grow it’s earning at a 7.54% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to AMBC which will have a positive growth at a 11.00% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of AMBC implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. PEP has an EBITDA margin of 20.16%, this implies that the underlying business of PEP is more profitable. The ROI of PEP is 16.40% while that of AMBC is -1.40%. These figures suggest that PEP ventures generate a higher ROI than that of AMBC.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, PEP’s free cash flow per share is a positive 1.02, while that of AMBC is negative -0.19.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of PEP is 4.01 compared to 8.25 for AMBC. AMBC can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than PEP.

Valuation

PEP currently trades at a forward P/E of 18.72, a P/B of 15.92, and a P/S of 2.50 while AMBC trades at a forward P/E of 6.09, a P/B of 0.54, and a P/S of 1.43. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, AMBC is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of PEP is currently at a -3.15% to its one-year price target of 117.40. Looking at its rival pricing, AMBC is at a -7.44% relative to its price target of 23.67.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), PEP is given a 2.50 while 2.00 placed for AMBC. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for PEP stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for PEP is 1.43 while that of AMBC is just 4.32. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for PEP stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. defeats that of PepsiCo, Inc. when the two are compared, with AMBC taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. AMBC happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, AMBC is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for AMBC is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Which of 2 stocks would appeal to long-term invest... The shares of Synthetic Biologics, Inc. have decreased by more than -94.89% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.64% or $0.01 and now tra...
Which Market Offer More Value? – Floor &... The shares of Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. have decreased by more than -41.76% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.49% or $0.69 and...
Which Market Offer More Value? – Conduent In... The shares of Conduent Incorporated have increased by more than 38.61% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.85% or $0.62 and now trades a...
A Comparison of Top Movers: The Williams Companies... The shares of The Williams Companies, Inc. have decreased by more than -0.56% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.80% or $0.24 and now t...
Comparing Top Moving Stocks TAL Education Group (T... The shares of TAL Education Group have increased by more than 3.30% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.37% or $0.71 and now trades at $...