The shares of Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. have decreased by more than -100.00% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -16.07% or -$0.01 and now trades at $0.07. The shares of CEVA, Inc. (NASDAQ:CEVA), has slumped by -40.20% year to date as of 08/07/2018. The shares currently trade at $27.60 and have been able to report a change of -8.31% over the past one week.
The stock of Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. and CEVA, Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Tuesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.Profitability and Returns
Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. HMNY has an EBITDA margin of 30.95%, this implies that the underlying business of HMNY is more profitable. The ROI of HMNY is 171.20% while that of CEVA is 5.70%. These figures suggest that HMNY ventures generate a higher ROI than that of CEVA.Cash Flow
The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, HMNY’s free cash flow per share is a negative -4.84.Liquidity and Financial Risk
The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for HMNY is 0.40 and that of CEVA is 7.00. This implies that it is easier for HMNY to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than CEVA.Valuation
HMNY currently trades at a P/S of 0.00 while CEVA trades at a forward P/E of 21.63, a P/B of 2.42, and a P/S of 7.29. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, HMNY is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.Analyst Price Targets and Opinions
The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of HMNY is currently at a -100% to its one-year price target of 3000.00. Looking at its rival pricing, CEVA is at a -36.45% relative to its price target of 43.43.
When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), HMNY is given a 3.00 while 2.00 placed for CEVA. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for HMNY stocks.
The stock of Helios and Matheson Analytics Inc. defeats that of CEVA, Inc. when the two are compared, with HMNY taking 7 out of the total factors that were been considered. HMNY happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, HMNY is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for HMNY is better on when it is viewed on short interest.