Financially Devastating or Fantastic? – The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB), Morgan Stanley (MS)

The shares of The Williams Companies, Inc. have decreased by more than -9.35% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.18% or -$0.05 and now trades at $27.64. The shares of Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS), has slumped by -6.82% year to date as of 06/22/2018. The shares currently trade at $48.89 and have been able to report a change of -4.44% over the past one week.

The stock of The Williams Companies, Inc. and Morgan Stanley were two of the most active stocks on Friday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 45.22% versus 20.32%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that WMB will grow it’s earning at a 45.22% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to MS which will have a positive growth at a 20.32% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of WMB implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. WMB has an EBITDA margin of 44.46%, this implies that the underlying business of MS is more profitable. The ROI of WMB is 3.10% while that of MS is 1.50%. These figures suggest that WMB ventures generate a higher ROI than that of MS.

Cash Flow

The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, WMB’s free cash flow per share is a negative -6.8, while that of MS is also a negative -25.01.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of WMB is 2.31 compared to 5.85 for MS. MS can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than WMB.


WMB currently trades at a forward P/E of 27.42, a P/B of 2.41, and a P/S of 2.82 while MS trades at a forward P/E of 9.53, a P/B of 1.22, and a P/S of 1.93. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, MS is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions

The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of WMB is currently at a -19.42% to its one-year price target of 34.30. Looking at its rival pricing, MS is at a -20.15% relative to its price target of 61.23.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), WMB is given a 1.90 while 2.30 placed for MS. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for MS stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for WMB is 2.80 while that of MS is just 1.04. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for MS stock.


The stock of Morgan Stanley defeats that of The Williams Companies, Inc. when the two are compared, with MS taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. MS happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, MS is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for MS is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Critical Comparison: The Cheesecake Factory Incorp... The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated (NASDAQ:CAKE) shares are down more than -24.50% this year and recently decreased -1.67% or -$0.77 to settle at $45...
Choosing Between Fitbit, Inc. (FIT) and Cognex Cor... Fitbit, Inc. (NYSE:FIT) shares are down more than -4.78% this year and recently increased 2.80% or $0.19 to settle at $6.97. Cognex Corporation (NASDA...
Which Market Offer More Value? – Southwest A... The shares of Southwest Airlines Co. have decreased by more than -19.42% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 1.70% or $0.88 and now trades...
Should You Buy SunPower Corporation (SPWR) or KLA-... SunPower Corporation (NASDAQ:SPWR) and KLA-Tencor Corporation (NASDAQ:KLAC) are the two most active stocks in the Semiconductor - Specialized industry...
Choosing Between Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.... Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. (NYSE:DKS) shares are down more than -49.44% this year and recently increased 1.36% or $0.36 to settle at $26.85. Big 5 Sp...