Which Market Offer More Value? – Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT), LG Display Co., Ltd. (LPL)

The shares of Nordic American Tankers Limited have decreased by more than -12.20% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -7.30% or -$0.17 and now trades at $2.16. The shares of LG Display Co., Ltd. (NYSE:LPL), has slumped by -30.81% year to date as of 06/15/2018. The shares currently trade at $9.52 and have been able to report a change of -8.81% over the past one week.

The stock of Nordic American Tankers Limited and LG Display Co., Ltd. were two of the most active stocks on Friday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 5.00% versus 9.40%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that NAT will grow it’s earning at a 5.00% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to LPL which will have a positive growth at a 9.40% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of LPL implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. The ROI of NAT is -16.00% while that of LPL is 10.10%. These figures suggest that LPL ventures generate a higher ROI than that of NAT.

Cash Flow

The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, NAT’s free cash flow per share is a negative -0.01, while that of LPL is also a negative -8203.55.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for NAT is 5.00 and that of LPL is 1.00. This implies that it is easier for NAT to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than LPL. The debt ratio of NAT is 0.55 compared to 0.47 for LPL. NAT can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than LPL.


NAT currently trades at a P/B of 0.33, and a P/S of 1.04 while LPL trades at a forward P/E of 14.25, a P/B of 0.51, and a P/S of 0.28. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, NAT is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions

The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of NAT is currently at a -35.91% to its one-year price target of 3.37. Looking at its rival pricing, LPL is at a -24.74% relative to its price target of 12.65.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), NAT is given a 3.30 while 3.00 placed for LPL. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for NAT stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for NAT is 7.06 while that of LPL is just 8.68. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for NAT stock.


The stock of LG Display Co., Ltd. defeats that of Nordic American Tankers Limited when the two are compared, with LPL taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. LPL happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, LPL is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for LPL is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Range Resources Corporation (RRC) vs. WPX Energy, ... Range Resources Corporation (NYSE:RRC) shares are down more than -49.51% this year and recently decreased -6.62% or -$1.23 to settle at $17.35. WPX En...
Ctrip.com International, Ltd. (CTRP) and 3D System... Ctrip.com International, Ltd. (NASDAQ:CTRP) shares are up more than 9.66% this year and recently increased 0.98% or $0.47 to settle at $48.36. 3D Syst...
HighPoint Resources Corporation (HPR) is better st... The shares of Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo - SABESP have decreased by more than -20.76% this year alone. The shares recently ...
SunPower Corporation (SPWR) Makes An Interesting C... SunPower Corporation (NASDAQ:SPWR) has recently been identified as an interesting stock but more in-depth monitoring is needed for a trade decision. N...
Choosing Between Knight-Swift Transportation Holdi... Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc. (NYSE:KNX) shares are up more than 8.10% this year and recently decreased -0.21% or -$0.1 to settle at $47.2...