Earnings

Comparing Valuation And Performance: MetLife, Inc. (MET), Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (RBA)

The shares of MetLife, Inc. have decreased by more than -9.91% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.62% or $0.28 and now trades at $45.55. The shares of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (NYSE:RBA), has jumped by 8.29% year to date as of 04/09/2018. The shares currently trade at $32.41 and have been able to report a change of 4.38% over the past one week.

The stock of MetLife, Inc. and Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated were two of the most active stocks on Monday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 15.00% versus 12.00%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that MET will grow it’s earning at a 15.00% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to RBA which will have a positive growth at a 12.00% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of MET implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. MET has an EBITDA margin of 6.95%, this implies that the underlying business of RBA is more profitable. The ROI of MET is 7.50% while that of RBA is 6.10%. These figures suggest that MET ventures generate a higher ROI than that of RBA.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, MET’s free cash flow per share is a positive 2.48, while that of RBA is positive 0.01.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of MET is 0.33 compared to 1.11 for RBA. RBA can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than MET.

Valuation

MET currently trades at a forward P/E of 8.43, a P/B of 0.82, and a P/S of 0.77 while RBA trades at a forward P/E of 25.16, a P/B of 4.70, and a P/S of 5.81. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, MET is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of MET is currently at a -16.47% to its one-year price target of 54.53. Looking at its rival pricing, RBA is at a -0.09% relative to its price target of 32.44.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), MET is given a 2.40 while 2.80 placed for RBA. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for RBA stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for MET is 1.74 while that of RBA is just 10.66. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for MET stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated defeats that of MetLife, Inc. when the two are compared, with RBA taking 3 out of the total factors that were been considered. RBA happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, RBA is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for RBA is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Should You Buy Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (SID... Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (NYSE:SID) shares are up more than 1.22% this year and recently increased 0.81% or $0.02 to settle at $2.48. Kindred He...
Critical Comparison: SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc. ... SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc. (NYSE:SEAS) shares are down more than -28.31% this year and recently decreased -1.24% or -$0.17 to settle at $13.57. Plan...
Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. (ALSK) a... Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALSK) shares are down more than -16.79% this year and recently increased 0.45% or $0.01 to settle at...
What Recent Ownership Trends Suggest About SeaWorl... Recent insider trends for SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc. (NYSE:SEAS) have caught the attention of investors. Patters in insider activity can help analys...
Which Market Offer More Value? – Kinder Morg... The shares of Kinder Morgan, Inc. have decreased by more than -3.21% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.81% or $0.14 and now trades at ...