Comparing Top Moving Stocks Credit Suisse Group AG (CS), trivago N.V. (TRVG)

The shares of Credit Suisse Group AG have increased by more than 4.54% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 5.54% or $0.98 and now trades at $18.66. The shares of trivago N.V. (NASDAQ:TRVG), has jumped by 19.59% year to date as of 02/14/2018. The shares currently trade at $8.18 and have been able to report a change of -1.56% over the past one week.

The stock of Credit Suisse Group AG and trivago N.V. were two of the most active stocks on Wednesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. CS has an EBITDA margin of 42.49%, this implies that the underlying business of CS is more profitable. The ROI of CS is 2.90% while that of TRVG is -1.60%. These figures suggest that CS ventures generate a higher ROI than that of TRVG.

Cash Flow 

The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, CS’s free cash flow per share is a negative -9.36, while that of TRVG is also a negative -2.69.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of CS is 4.11 compared to 0.00 for TRVG. CS can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than TRVG.


CS currently trades at a forward P/E of 19.12, a P/B of 1.02, and a P/S of 2.65 while TRVG trades at a forward P/E of 227.22, a P/B of 2.74, and a P/S of 2.29. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, CS is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions

The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of CS is currently at a -4.21% to its one-year price target of 19.48. Looking at its rival pricing, TRVG is at a -6.19% relative to its price target of 8.72. This figure implies that over the next one year, TRVG is a better investment.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), CS is given a 1.00 while 3.00 placed for TRVG. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for TRVG stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for CS is 2.23 while that of TRVG is just 6.22. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for CS stock.


The stock of Credit Suisse Group AG defeats that of trivago N.V. when the two are compared, with CS taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. CS happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, CS is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for CS is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Here is why Technicals Are a BEAR on Banco Bradesc... Banco Bradesco S.A. (NYSE:BBD) fell by -3.00% in Monday’s trading session from $11.01 to $10.68. The price has fallen in 7 of the last 10 days and is ...
Financially Devastating or Fantastic? – Rema... The shares of Remark Holdings, Inc. have increased by more than 126.02% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -7.42% or -$0.71 and now tra...
The Long Case For Altaba Inc. (AABA) It's worth it to have a look at Altaba Inc. (NASDAQ:AABA) as there may be a chasm between the bulls and the bears as far as recent trading activity go...
Which is more compelling pick right now? – A... The shares of Advaxis, Inc. have decreased by more than -33.80% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.53% or -$0.01 and now trades at $...
Taking Tally Of Ballard Power Systems Inc. (BLDP),... The shares of Ballard Power Systems Inc. have decreased by more than -25.85% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -13.72% or -$0.52 and n...