Comparing Valuation And Performance: Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL), SUPERVALU INC. (SVU)

The shares of Colgate-Palmolive Company have decreased by more than -16.42% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -1.05% or -$0.67 and now trades at $63.06. The shares of SUPERVALU INC. (NYSE:SVU), has slumped by -7.92% year to date as of 06/13/2018. The shares currently trade at $19.89 and have been able to report a change of 0.05% over the past one week.

The stock of Colgate-Palmolive Company and SUPERVALU INC. were two of the most active stocks on Wednesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 8.31% versus 2.38%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that CL will grow it’s earning at a 8.31% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to SVU which will have a positive growth at a 2.38% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of CL implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. CL has an EBITDA margin of 25.77%, this implies that the underlying business of CL is more profitable. The ROI of CL is 39.10% while that of SVU is 8.10%. These figures suggest that CL ventures generate a higher ROI than that of SVU.

Cash Flow

The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, CL’s free cash flow per share is a positive 0.96, while that of SVU is positive 1.36.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for CL is 1.10 and that of SVU is 1.20. This implies that it is easier for CL to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than SVU.


CL currently trades at a forward P/E of 18.59, and a P/S of 3.52 while SVU trades at a forward P/E of 8.77, a P/B of 1.50, and a P/S of 0.05. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, SVU is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions

The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of CL is currently at a -12.23% to its one-year price target of 71.85. Looking at its rival pricing, SVU is at a -17.33% relative to its price target of 24.06.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), CL is given a 2.70 while 2.90 placed for SVU. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for SVU stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for CL is 2.92 while that of SVU is just 7.01. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for CL stock.


The stock of SUPERVALU INC. defeats that of Colgate-Palmolive Company when the two are compared, with SVU taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. SVU happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, SVU is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for SVU is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Choosing Between McDonald’s Corporation (MCD... McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) shares are up more than 40.83% this year and recently decreased -0.25% or -$0.43 to settle at $171.42. Dunkin' Brand...
Should You Buy The AES Corporation (AES) or Black ... Black Hills Corporation (NYSE:BKH), on the other hand, is down -5.49% year to date as of 11/07/2017. It currently trades at $57.97 and has returned -1...
Critical Comparison: Synchrony Financial (SYF) vs.... Synchrony Financial (NYSE:SYF) shares are down more than -13.75% this year and recently increased 2.43% or $0.79 to settle at $33.30. Edison Internati...
Are These Stocks A Sure Bet? – Humana Inc. (... The shares of Humana Inc. have increased by more than 19.44% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.19% or $6.34 and now trades at $296.29....
Which is more compelling pick right now? – H... The shares of HighPoint Resources Corporation have increased by more than 34.70% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.52% or $0.17 and no...