Earnings

Uncovering the next great stocks: Walmart Inc. (WMT), C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW)

The shares of Walmart Inc. have decreased by more than -14.37% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.07% or -$0.06 and now trades at $84.56. The shares of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ:CHRW), has slumped by -1.45% year to date as of 06/06/2018. The shares currently trade at $87.80 and have been able to report a change of -1.82% over the past one week.

The stock of Walmart Inc. and C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Wednesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 6.47% versus 12.07%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that WMT will grow it’s earning at a 6.47% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to CHRW which will have a positive growth at a 12.07% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of CHRW implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. WMT has an EBITDA margin of 5.56%, this implies that the underlying business of WMT is more profitable. The ROI of WMT is 10.00% while that of CHRW is 18.10%. These figures suggest that CHRW ventures generate a higher ROI than that of WMT.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, WMT’s free cash flow per share is a positive 0.36, while that of CHRW is positive 0.81.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for WMT is 0.80 and that of CHRW is 1.30. This implies that it is easier for WMT to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than CHRW. The debt ratio of WMT is 0.60 compared to 0.99 for CHRW. CHRW can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than WMT.

Valuation

WMT currently trades at a forward P/E of 16.87, a P/B of 3.21, and a P/S of 0.49 while CHRW trades at a forward P/E of 18.21, a P/B of 8.28, and a P/S of 0.80. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, WMT is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of WMT is currently at a -12.29% to its one-year price target of 96.41. Looking at its rival pricing, CHRW is at a -4.08% relative to its price target of 91.53.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), WMT is given a 2.30 while 2.70 placed for CHRW. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for CHRW stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for WMT is 3.98 while that of CHRW is just 8.09. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for WMT stock.

Conclusion

The stock of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. defeats that of Walmart Inc. when the two are compared, with CHRW taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. CHRW happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, CHRW is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for CHRW is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (HMY) and Alta... Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (NYSE:HMY) shares are up more than 24.60% this year and recently decreased -0.43% or -$0.01 to settle at $2.33. Al...
Marathon Oil Corporation (MRO) vs. Ultra Petroleum... Marathon Oil Corporation (NYSE:MRO) shares are down more than -12.31% this year and recently increased 0.20% or $0.03 to settle at $15.18. Ultra Petro...
A Side-by-side Analysis of Oclaro, Inc. (OCLR) and... Oclaro, Inc. (NASDAQ:OCLR) shares are up more than 45.70% this year and recently decreased -0.51% or -$0.05 to settle at $9.82. Albemarle Corporation ...
Comparing ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) and Altice USA,... ICICI Bank Limited (NYSE:IBN) shares are down more than -15.11% this year and recently increased 0.85% or $0.07 to settle at $8.26. Altice USA, Inc. (...
Horizon Pharma Public Limited Company (HZNP): Are ... Horizon Pharma Public Limited Company (NASDAQ:HZNP) seems to be forming a pattern of major movements, providing only some crumbs of outlook for market...