Comparing Top Moving Stocks Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (ETP), CubeSmart (CUBE)

The shares of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. have increased by more than 7.53% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -1.08% or -$0.21 and now trades at $19.27. The shares of CubeSmart (NYSE:CUBE), has jumped by 7.26% year to date as of 06/06/2018. The shares currently trade at $31.02 and have been able to report a change of 1.41% over the past one week.

The stock of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. and CubeSmart were two of the most active stocks on Wednesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. ETP has an EBITDA margin of 19.31%, this implies that the underlying business of CUBE is more profitable. The ROI of ETP is 3.30% while that of CUBE is 6.00%. These figures suggest that CUBE ventures generate a higher ROI than that of ETP.

Cash Flow

The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, ETP’s free cash flow per share is a negative -2.97.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of ETP is 1.28 compared to 1.05 for CUBE. ETP can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than CUBE.


ETP currently trades at a forward P/E of 14.16, a P/B of 0.86, and a P/S of 0.73 while CUBE trades at a forward P/E of 35.21, a P/B of 3.51, and a P/S of 9.94. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, ETP is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions

The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of ETP is currently at a -19.03% to its one-year price target of 23.80. Looking at its rival pricing, CUBE is at a 1.04% relative to its price target of 30.70.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), ETP is given a 1.70 while 2.70 placed for CUBE. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for CUBE stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for ETP is 2.00 while that of CUBE is just 7.22. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for ETP stock.


The stock of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. defeats that of CubeSmart when the two are compared, with ETP taking 7 out of the total factors that were been considered. ETP happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, ETP is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for ETP is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Financially Devastating or Fantastic? – Tech... The shares of TechnipFMC plc have decreased by more than -4.69% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 3.43% or $0.99 and now trades at $29.8...
A Side-by-side Analysis of United Financial Bancor... United Financial Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:UBNK) shares are down more than -9.92% this year and recently increased 0.38% or $0.06 to settle at $15.89. Ent...
A Side-by-side Analysis of CSRA Inc. (CSRA) and Ma... CSRA Inc. (NYSE:CSRA) shares are up more than 36.03% this year and recently increased 0.42% or $0.17 to settle at $40.70. Masco Corporation (NYSE:MAS)...
A Side-by-side Analysis of Kindred Healthcare, Inc... Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE:KND) and Capital Senior Living Corporation (NYSE:CSU) are the two most active stocks in the Long-Term Care Facilities i...
Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) vs. Netlist, Inc. (NL... Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) shares are up more than 126.64% this year and recently increased 1.10% or $0.54 to settle at $49.68. Netlist, Inc....