Earnings

Comparing Top Moving Stocks Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)

The shares of Amazon.com, Inc. have increased by more than 45.00% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.04% or -$0.6 and now trades at $1695.75. The shares of Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT), has slumped by -0.36% year to date as of 06/06/2018. The shares currently trade at $319.91 and have been able to report a change of -0.35% over the past one week.

The stock of Amazon.com, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation were two of the most active stocks on Wednesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 27.14% versus 46.90%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that AMZN will grow it’s earning at a 27.14% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to LMT which will have a positive growth at a 46.90% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of LMT implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. AMZN has an EBITDA margin of 9.68%, this implies that the underlying business of LMT is more profitable. The ROI of AMZN is 3.60% while that of LMT is 33.10%. These figures suggest that LMT ventures generate a higher ROI than that of AMZN.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, AMZN’s free cash flow per share is a negative -2.68, while that of LMT is also a negative -0.33.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for AMZN is 1.10 and that of LMT is 1.30. This implies that it is easier for AMZN to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than LMT.

Valuation

AMZN currently trades at a forward P/E of 84.65, a P/B of 26.08, and a P/S of 4.23 while LMT trades at a forward P/E of 17.43, and a P/S of 1.77. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, AMZN is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of AMZN is currently at a -7.35% to its one-year price target of 1830.20. Looking at its rival pricing, LMT is at a -13.98% relative to its price target of 371.89.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), AMZN is given a 1.70 while 2.40 placed for LMT. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for LMT stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for AMZN is 1.05 while that of LMT is just 1.75. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for AMZN stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Amazon.com, Inc. defeats that of Lockheed Martin Corporation when the two are compared, with AMZN taking 2 out of the total factors that were been considered. AMZN happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, AMZN is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for AMZN is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Drilling Down Into the Books for Windstream Holdin... Windstream Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:WIN) has recently been identified as an interesting stock but more in-depth monitoring is needed for a trade decisio...
Which of these 2 stocks can turn out to be absolut... The shares of Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. have decreased by more than -1.76% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -3.60% or -$1.54 and no...
Comparing Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. (FLXN) and Mo... Flexion Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:FLXN) shares are up more than 29.81% this year and recently increased 1.48% or $0.36 to settle at $24.69. Momenta P...
Financially Devastating or Fantastic? – Colg... The shares of Colgate-Palmolive Company have decreased by more than -17.53% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.11% or -$0.07 and now...
A Comparison of Top Movers: Macerich Company (MAC)... The shares of Macerich Company have decreased by more than -12.45% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.09% or -$0.05 and now trades a...