Earnings

Choosing Between Hot Stocks: Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG), Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (PPC)

The shares of Cheniere Energy, Inc. have increased by more than 21.32% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.96% or -$0.63 and now trades at $65.32. The shares of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation (NASDAQ:PPC), has slumped by -37.31% year to date as of 06/06/2018. The shares currently trade at $19.47 and have been able to report a change of -4.23% over the past one week.

The stock of Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation were two of the most active stocks on Wednesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 48.30% versus -3.20%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that LNG will grow it’s earning at a 48.30% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to PPC which will have a positive growth at a -3.20% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of LNG implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. LNG has an EBITDA margin of 34.24%, this implies that the underlying business of LNG is more profitable. The ROI of LNG is 7.20% while that of PPC is 16.90%. These figures suggest that PPC ventures generate a higher ROI than that of LNG.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, LNG’s free cash flow per share is a negative -5.72, while that of PPC is also a negative -0.72.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for LNG is 3.70 and that of PPC is 1.80. This implies that it is easier for LNG to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than PPC.

Valuation

LNG currently trades at a forward P/E of 26.62, and a P/S of 2.42 while PPC trades at a forward P/E of 6.60, a P/B of 2.39, and a P/S of 0.44. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, PPC is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of LNG is currently at a -4.78% to its one-year price target of 68.60. Looking at its rival pricing, PPC is at a -34% relative to its price target of 29.50.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), LNG is given a 1.60 while 2.50 placed for PPC. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for PPC stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for LNG is 4.85 while that of PPC is just 7.26. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for LNG stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Cheniere Energy, Inc. defeats that of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation when the two are compared, with LNG taking 7 out of the total factors that were been considered. LNG happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, LNG is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for LNG is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Net Element, Inc. (NETE) Daily Technical Review &#... Net Element, Inc. (NASDAQ:NETE) gained 44.72% in Friday’s session, going up from its prior closing price of $0.50 to $0.72. The price has been moving ...
Financial Metrics You Should Care About: TE Connec... The shares of TE Connectivity Ltd. have decreased by more than -0.69% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -3.44% or -$3.36 and now trade...
Altria Group, Inc. (MO) vs. Philip Morris Internat... Altria Group, Inc. (NYSE:MO) shares are down more than -1.69% this year and recently decreased -0.40% or -$0.28 to settle at $70.20. Philip Morris Int...
Which of these 2 stocks can turn out to be absolut... The shares of ProPetro Holding Corp. have decreased by more than -26.64% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 4.15% or $0.59 and now trades...
Which is more compelling pick right now? – F... The shares of Frontier Communications Corporation have increased by more than 13.61% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 2.54% or $0.19 an...