Earnings

Comparing Top Moving Stocks Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ), Lennar Corporation (LEN)

The shares of Mondelez International, Inc. have decreased by more than -8.36% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.03% or -$0.01 and now trades at $39.22. The shares of Lennar Corporation (NYSE:LEN), has slumped by -14.15% year to date as of 05/14/2018. The shares currently trade at $54.29 and have been able to report a change of -0.07% over the past one week.

The stock of Mondelez International, Inc. and Lennar Corporation were two of the most active stocks on Monday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 10.68% versus 25.42%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that MDLZ will grow it’s earning at a 10.68% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to LEN which will have a positive growth at a 25.42% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of LEN implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. MDLZ has an EBITDA margin of 16.7%, this implies that the underlying business of MDLZ is more profitable. The ROI of MDLZ is 6.30% while that of LEN is 4.90%. These figures suggest that MDLZ ventures generate a higher ROI than that of LEN.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, MDLZ’s free cash flow per share is a negative -0.8, while that of LEN is also a negative -1.88.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of MDLZ is 0.71 compared to 0.89 for LEN. LEN can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than MDLZ.

Valuation

MDLZ currently trades at a forward P/E of 14.70, a P/B of 2.21, and a P/S of 2.22 while LEN trades at a forward P/E of 8.15, a P/B of 1.05, and a P/S of 1.28. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, LEN is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of MDLZ is currently at a -20.06% to its one-year price target of 49.06. Looking at its rival pricing, LEN is at a -29.64% relative to its price target of 77.16.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), MDLZ is given a 2.00 while 1.90 placed for LEN. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for MDLZ stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for MDLZ is 1.33 while that of LEN is just 2.52. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for MDLZ stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Lennar Corporation defeats that of Mondelez International, Inc. when the two are compared, with LEN taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. LEN happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, LEN is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for LEN is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Ensco plc (ESV) vs. SLM Corporation (SLM): Breakin... Ensco plc (NYSE:ESV) shares are down more than -23.01% this year and recently increased 0.66% or $0.03 to settle at $4.55. SLM Corporation (NASDAQ:SLM...
Dissecting the Numbers for Corning Incorporated (G... Corning Incorporated (NYSE:GLW) shares are up more than 5.53% this year and recently increased 1.02% or $0.34 to settle at $33.76. KEMET Corporation (...
Should You Invest in Top Ships Inc. (TOPS)? A Look... Recent insider trends for Top Ships Inc. (NASDAQ:TOPS) have caught the attention of investors. Analysts monitor insider data to understand the sentime...
MetLife, Inc. (MET) vs. The Boeing Company (BA): C...   MetLife, Inc. (NYSE:MET) shares are down more than -6.84% this year and recently increased 0.17% or $0.08 to settle at $47.10. The Boeing Co...
BioPharmX Corporation (NYSE:BPMX) Technical Analys... BioPharmX Corporation (NYSE:BPMX) gained 6.11% in yesterday’s trading, going up from its prior closing price of $0.31 to $0.33, and has now recorded r...