Earnings

Comparing Top Moving Stocks Emerson Electric Co. (EMR), The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK)

The shares of Emerson Electric Co. have increased by more than 3.54% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.22% or $0.16 and now trades at $72.16. The shares of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (NYSE:BK), has jumped by 6.39% year to date as of 05/14/2018. The shares currently trade at $57.30 and have been able to report a change of 3.08% over the past one week.

The stock of Emerson Electric Co. and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation were two of the most active stocks on Monday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 15.80% versus 9.35%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that EMR will grow it’s earning at a 15.80% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to BK which will have a positive growth at a 9.35% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of EMR implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. EMR has an EBITDA margin of 24.44%, this implies that the underlying business of BK is more profitable. The ROI of EMR is 13.70% while that of BK is 3.20%. These figures suggest that EMR ventures generate a higher ROI than that of BK.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, EMR’s free cash flow per share is a positive 0.58, while that of BK is negative -7.79.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of EMR is 0.61 compared to 0.74 for BK. BK can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than EMR.

Valuation

EMR currently trades at a forward P/E of 19.98, a P/B of 5.38, and a P/S of 2.77 while BK trades at a forward P/E of 12.50, a P/B of 1.56, and a P/S of 12.04. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, BK is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of EMR is currently at a -1.66% to its one-year price target of 73.38. Looking at its rival pricing, BK is at a -5.29% relative to its price target of 60.50.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), EMR is given a 2.40 while 2.70 placed for BK. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for BK stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for EMR is 2.05 while that of BK is just 2.51. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for EMR stock.

Conclusion

The stock of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation defeats that of Emerson Electric Co. when the two are compared, with BK taking 4 out of the total factors that were been considered. BK happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, BK is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for BK is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Taking Tally Of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI), Synchro... The shares of Kinder Morgan, Inc. have decreased by more than -8.85% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -0.42% or -$0.07 and now trades...
Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT) vs. Condor Hospitalit... Chatham Lodging Trust (NYSE:CLDT) shares are down more than -8.57% this year and recently decreased -0.29% or -$0.06 to settle at $20.81. Condor Hospi...
Choosing Between Washington Prime Group Inc. (WPG)... Washington Prime Group Inc. (NYSE:WPG) shares are down more than -0.28% this year and recently increased 0.42% or $0.03 to settle at $7.10. Paramount ...
Reliable Long-term Trend to Profit From: Juniper N... The shares of Juniper Networks, Inc. have decreased by more than -6.14% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.87% or $0.23 and now trades ...
Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) vs. Genuine Parts Co... Tractor Supply Company (NASDAQ:TSCO) shares are down more than -10.09% this year and recently decreased -0.12% or -$0.08 to settle at $68.16. Genuine ...