Earnings

Are These Stocks A Sure Bet? – International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), XL Group Ltd (XL)

The shares of International Business Machines Corporation have decreased by more than -5.94% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.11% or $0.16 and now trades at $144.30. The shares of XL Group Ltd (NYSE:XL), has jumped by 56.40% year to date as of 05/14/2018. The shares currently trade at $54.99 and have been able to report a change of -0.11% over the past one week.

The stock of International Business Machines Corporation and XL Group Ltd were two of the most active stocks on Monday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 2.92% versus 21.90%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that IBM will grow it’s earning at a 2.92% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to XL which will have a positive growth at a 21.90% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of XL implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. IBM has an EBITDA margin of 20.38%, this implies that the underlying business of IBM is more profitable. The ROI of IBM is 17.40% while that of XL is -1.70%. These figures suggest that IBM ventures generate a higher ROI than that of XL.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, IBM’s free cash flow per share is a positive 2.95, while that of XL is negative -0.89.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of IBM is 2.55 compared to 0.34 for XL. IBM can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than XL.

Valuation

IBM currently trades at a forward P/E of 10.23, a P/B of 7.31, and a P/S of 1.66 while XL trades at a forward P/E of 14.21, a P/B of 1.47, and a P/S of 1.25. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, IBM is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of IBM is currently at a -14.51% to its one-year price target of 168.80. Looking at its rival pricing, XL is at a 3.79% relative to its price target of 52.98.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), IBM is given a 2.60 while 2.90 placed for XL. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for XL stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for IBM is 2.61 while that of XL is just 1.05. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for XL stock.

Conclusion

The stock of XL Group Ltd defeats that of International Business Machines Corporation when the two are compared, with XL taking 6 out of the total factors that were been considered. XL happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, XL is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for XL is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Reviewing the Insider Trends for KEMET Corporation... Recent insider trends for KEMET Corporation (NYSE:KEM) have caught the attention of investors. Patters in insider activity can help analysts formulate...
Taking Tally Of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company... The shares of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. have decreased by more than -6.07% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 7.29% or $1.0...
Are These Stocks A Sure Bet? – Cheniere Ener... The shares of Cheniere Energy, Inc. have increased by more than 4.40% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 3.52% or $1.91 and now trades at...
Critical Comparison: NuVasive, Inc. (NUVA) vs. Sec... NuVasive, Inc. (NASDAQ:NUVA) shares are down more than -11.11% this year and recently decreased -2.51% or -$1.34 to settle at $51.99. Second Sight Med...
Reliable Long-term Trend to Profit From: Starbucks... The shares of Starbucks Corporation have increased by more than 2.21% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.62% or $0.36 and now trades at...