Earnings

Which of 2 stocks would appeal to long-term investors? Wells Fargo & Company (WFC), Yamana Gold Inc. (AUY)

The shares of Wells Fargo & Company have decreased by more than -16.12% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -3.43% or -$1.81 and now trades at $50.89. The shares of Yamana Gold Inc. (NYSE:AUY), has slumped by -6.73% year to date as of 04/13/2018. The shares currently trade at $2.91 and have been able to report a change of 5.43% over the past one week.

The stock of Wells Fargo & Company and Yamana Gold Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Friday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 9.37% versus 40.04%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that WFC will grow it’s earning at a 9.37% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to AUY which will have a positive growth at a 40.04% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of AUY implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. WFC has an EBITDA margin of 49.07%, this implies that the underlying business of WFC is more profitable. The ROI of WFC is 9.80% while that of AUY is -1.10%. These figures suggest that WFC ventures generate a higher ROI than that of AUY.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, WFC’s free cash flow per share is a positive 0, while that of AUY is negative -5.26.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The debt ratio of WFC is 1.24 compared to 0.00 for AUY. WFC can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than AUY.

Valuation

WFC currently trades at a forward P/E of 9.59, a P/B of 1.38, and a P/S of 4.36 while AUY trades at a forward P/E of 15.82, a P/B of 0.64, and a P/S of 1.53. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, WFC is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions




The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of WFC is currently at a -19.41% to its one-year price target of 63.15. Looking at its rival pricing, AUY is at a -24.61% relative to its price target of 3.86.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), WFC is given a 2.70 while 2.60 placed for AUY. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for WFC stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for WFC is 1.35 while that of AUY is just 1.05. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for AUY stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Wells Fargo & Company defeats that of Yamana Gold Inc. when the two are compared, with WFC taking 5 out of the total factors that were been considered. WFC happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, WFC is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for WFC is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

3D Systems Corporation (DDD) and Mercury Systems, ... Mercury Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:MRCY), on the other hand, is down -6.10% year to date as of 02/01/2018. It currently trades at $48.22 and has returned 3...
Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI) and VeriFone Systems, Inc.... Pitney Bowes Inc. (NYSE:PBI) shares are down more than -25.15% this year and recently decreased -0.09% or -$0.01 to settle at $11.37. VeriFone Systems...
Choosing Between McDonald’s Corporation (MCD... McDonald's Corporation (NYSE:MCD) shares are up more than 38.27% this year and recently increased 0.82% or $1.37 to settle at $168.30. Ark Restaurants...
TransEnterix, Inc. (TRXC) vs. Editas Medicine, Inc... TransEnterix, Inc. (NYSE:TRXC) shares are down more than -9.84% this year and recently decreased -0.57% or -$0.01 to settle at $1.74. Editas Medicine,...
Choosing Between Fitbit, Inc. (FIT) and Cognex Cor... Fitbit, Inc. (NYSE:FIT) shares are down more than -13.93% this year and recently decreased -7.62% or -$0.52 to settle at $6.30. Cognex Corporation (NA...