Earnings

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is better stock pick than Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR)

The shares of Microsoft Corporation have increased by more than 8.00% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 0.05% or $0.05 and now trades at $92.38. The shares of Restaurant Brands International Inc. (NYSE:QSR), has slumped by -7.95% year to date as of 04/05/2018. The shares currently trade at $56.59 and have been able to report a change of 1.76% over the past one week.

The stock of Microsoft Corporation and Restaurant Brands International Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Thuday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 11.07% versus 19.13%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that MSFT will grow it’s earning at a 11.07% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to QSR which will have a positive growth at a 19.13% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of QSR implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. MSFT has an EBITDA margin of 27.9%, this implies that the underlying business of QSR is more profitable. These figures suggest that MSFT ventures generate a higher ROI than that of QSR.

Cash Flow



The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, MSFT’s free cash flow per share is a positive 2.31, while that of QSR is positive 9.59.

Valuation

MSFT currently trades at a forward P/E of 23.58, a P/B of 9.09, and a P/S of 7.20 while QSR trades at a forward P/E of 18.99, a P/B of 6.20, and a P/S of 3.02. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, QSR is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions

The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of MSFT is currently at a -11.64% to its one-year price target of 104.55. Looking at its rival pricing, QSR is at a -19.73% relative to its price target of 70.50.




When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), MSFT is given a 1.80 while 2.30 placed for QSR. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for QSR stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for MSFT is 1.67 while that of QSR is just 3.58. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for MSFT stock.

Conclusion

The stock of Microsoft Corporation defeats that of Restaurant Brands International Inc. when the two are compared, with MSFT taking 4 out of the total factors that were been considered. MSFT happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, MSFT is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for MSFT is better on when it is viewed on short interest.

Previous ArticleNext Article

Related Post

Vermillion, Inc. (VRML) is better stock pick than ... The shares of Gold Fields Limited have decreased by more than -9.07% this year alone. The shares recently went up by 3.71% or $0.14 and now trades at ...
Critical Comparison: Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. (... Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:EKSO) shares are down more than -22.86% this year and recently increased 6.60% or $0.19 to settle at $3.07. OraSur...
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) vs. Se... Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (NYSE:ARE) shares are down more than -8.91% this year and recently increased 0.35% or $0.42 to settle at $118.96...
The Michaels Companies, Inc. (MIK) vs. Entercom Co... Entercom Communications Corp. (NYSE:ETM), on the other hand, is down -11.57% year to date as of 03/21/2018. It currently trades at $9.55 and has retur...
Comparing Entergy Corporation (ETR) and Ameren Cor... Entergy Corporation (NYSE:ETR) shares are up more than 7.34% this year and recently increased 0.27% or $0.21 to settle at $78.86. Ameren Corporation (...