The shares of Sequans Communications S.A. have decreased by more than -21.99% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -4.49% or -$0.07 and now trades at $1.49. The shares of Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSII), has slumped by -7.77% year to date as of 02/13/2018. The shares currently trade at $21.85 and have been able to report a change of -11.39% over the past one week.

The stock of Sequans Communications S.A. and Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Tuesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

**Next 5Y EPS Growth: 0.35% versus 15.00%**

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that SQNS will grow it’s earning at a 0.35% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to CSII which will have a positive growth at a 15.00% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of CSII implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

**Profitability and Returns**

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. The ROI of SQNS is -60.90% while that of CSII is -1.20%. These figures suggest that CSII ventures generate a higher ROI than that of SQNS.

**Cash Flow **

The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, SQNS’s free cash flow per share is a negative -0.02.

**Liquidity and Financial Risk**

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for SQNS is 1.20 and that of CSII is 4.30. This implies that it is easier for SQNS to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than CSII. The debt ratio of SQNS is 3.56 compared to 0.18 for CSII. SQNS can be able to settle its long-term debts and thus is a lower financial risk than CSII.

**Valuation**

SQNS currently trades at a P/B of 16.56, and a P/S of 2.76 while CSII trades at a forward P/E of 122.75, a P/B of 6.00, and a P/S of 3.58. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, SQNS is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

**Analyst Price Targets and Opinions**

The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of SQNS is currently at a -61.4% to its one-year price target of 3.86. Looking at its rival pricing, CSII is at a -33.79% relative to its price target of 33.00. This figure implies that over the next one year, CSII is a better investment.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), SQNS is given a 1.70 while 2.40 placed for CSII. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for CSII stocks.

**Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment**

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for SQNS is 8.78 while that of CSII is just 3.93. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for CSII stock.

**Conclusion**

The stock of Sequans Communications S.A. defeats that of Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. when the two are compared, with SQNS taking 4 out of the total factors that were been considered. SQNS happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, SQNS is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for SQNS is better on when it is viewed on short interest.